The Art of Fine-Tuning Large Language Models (LLMs)

Rany ElHousieny
Level Up Coding
Published in
17 min readNov 15, 2023

--

The advent of models like GPT-3 and GPT-4 by OpenAI has ushered in a new era of natural language processing capabilities. These generative pre-trained transformers have shown remarkable proficiency in understanding and generating human-like text. However, their generalist nature often requires fine-tuning to tailor them for specific tasks or domains. In this article, we delve into the fine-tuning process, specifically Instruction Fine-Tuning, illustrating with Python examples how this powerful technique can refine a model’s capabilities.

What is Fine-Tuning?

Fine-tuning is the process of taking a pre-trained model, like GPT-3, and further training it on a specific dataset. It is the process used to turn GPT into ChatGPT and give it its chatting power. This process allows the model to specialize, improving its performance on tasks related to fine-tuning data.

Why Fine-Tune?

A pre-trained GPT model is like a jack-of-all-trades but a master of none. Fine-tuning helps turn it into a specialist. For instance, a model trained additionally on legal documents will perform better in legal document analysis.

Imagine you’re not feeling well and you first visit your Primary Care Physician (PCP). Your PCP is well-versed in a broad range of common health issues, much like a general Large Language Model (LLM) is trained on a wide array of topics. The PCP can handle many different kinds of problems, provide general advice, and treat a variety of ailments. However, their knowledge isn’t deeply specialized in any one area.

Now, suppose during your visit, the PCP finds that your symptoms may indicate a heart-related issue. They will then refer you to a cardiologist, a specialist who has focused knowledge and expertise in heart-related conditions. The cardiologist, through additional years of focused training, is “fine-tuned” to understand the nuances of cardiology much better than the PCP.

Similarly, when you fine-tune a language model, you’re essentially turning it from a GP into a specialist. You start with the general model, which knows a little bit about a lot of topics, and you train it further on a specific dataset. This dataset is usually highly relevant to the task you want the model to perform. Through this process, the model becomes more knowledgeable and effective in that particular domain. It can understand the specific terminology, answer relevant questions more accurately, and generate text that is more appropriate for specialized tasks within that field.

Just as a cardiologist is more reliable for heart-specific diagnoses and treatments than a PCP, a fine-tuned LLM is more reliable for tasks within its specialized domain than a general LLM.

Alpaca Has Led the Way

Lambda Labs claimed it would take 355 years and $4.600,000 to re-train the GPT Model. However, by re-training (Fine-Tuning) a model with less than $600 using GPT prompt engineering, Alpaca opened the door for a new era of affordable Fine-Tuning processes. After releasing LORA, you can even Fine-Tune a model much less than that. This process will become very normal as the computing power becomes cheaper, leading to affordable customized AI.

Prompt Engineering Versus Fine-Tuning

In this section, we will Compare prompt engineering versus fine-tuning in the context of using language models like GPT.

Prompt Engineering

Prompt engineering involves crafting inputs (prompts) to guide the behavior of a pre-trained language model without modifying the model’s weights. This means you’re essentially “programming” the AI with inputs to get the desired output.

Pros:

  • No Data Requirement: You don’t need a dataset to get started; you can use the model right out of the box.
  • Lower Upfront Costs: There’s no need for additional training, which can be expensive in terms of compute resources.
  • Accessibility: Anyone can do prompt engineering without deep technical knowledge of machine learning.
  • Data Retrieval: It can connect to external knowledge through retrieval techniques like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), which can combine the benefits of both retrieval-based and generative AI.

Cons:

  • Limited by Data: The model can only draw on the data it was trained on and can’t learn from new information unless it’s been updated.
  • Memory Constraints: Over time, the model may “forget” previous data if not consistently prompted or interacted with in a certain context.
  • Potential for Inaccuracies: The model may generate plausible but incorrect or nonsensical information (hallucinations), and RAG might retrieve incorrect data if the query is not well-structured.

Fine-Tuning

Fine-tuning is the process of continuing the training of a pre-trained model on a new, typically smaller, dataset to specialize its knowledge or improve its performance on certain tasks.

Pros:

  • Capacity for Learning: Fine-tuning allows the model to learn from new and potentially unlimited data, not just the data it was initially trained on.
  • Correcting Errors: It can correct previously learned incorrect information by training on a more accurate and curated dataset.
  • Efficiency: Once fine-tuned, the model may become more efficient in generating responses, especially if using a smaller model for a specific task.
  • Data Retrieval: Fine-tuning doesn’t exclude the use of techniques like RAG, which can be combined with fine-tuned models for even more accurate outputs.

Cons:

  • Data Quantity and Quality: Requires a substantial amount of high-quality, task-specific data for fine-tuning to be effective.
  • Compute Costs: There’s a significant compute cost upfront due to the resources required for additional training.
  • Technical Expertise: Requires technical knowledge, particularly in data science and machine learning, to effectively fine-tune and manage the model.

Additional Considerations:

  • Scalability: Fine-tuning can be scaled up to accommodate very large datasets, which is advantageous for enterprise-level applications.
  • Customization: Fine-tuning allows for a high degree of customization, making it possible to adapt the model to specific domains or applications.
  • Privacy: When fine-tuning a model on proprietary data, privacy becomes a critical consideration, as the model may inadvertently memorize and reproduce sensitive information.

In summary, prompt engineering is often used for generic tasks, quick prototypes, or when resource constraints limit the ability to fine-tune. On the other hand, fine-tuning is preferred for domain-specific applications, enterprise solutions, and when the model’s outputs need to adhere to privacy constraints or reflect the most up-to-date information.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a method that combines the strengths of two different approaches to language processing: retrieval-based and generative models. RAG aims to improve the quality and relevance of responses generated by models like GPT by incorporating external knowledge.

Here’s a breakdown of how RAG works:

  1. Retrieval-based Component: The retrieval part of RAG is responsible for fetching relevant documents or information snippets from a large corpus of data. This could be a database of articles, a knowledge base, or the internet. The model uses a query generated from the input prompt to find the best-matching documents. This process is often powered by a dense vector retrieval system, where documents and queries are embedded into a high-dimensional space and the closest matches are retrieved based on vector similarity.
  2. Generative Component: Once the relevant information has been retrieved, a generative model (like GPT) takes over. This model uses the retrieved documents as additional context to generate a response. The generative model is trained to consider both the original prompt and the retrieved information when producing its output.
  3. End-to-End Training: RAG models are typically trained end-to-end, which means that the retrieval and generative components are trained together to maximize the relevance and coherence of the generated text. During training, the model learns to adjust the retrieval queries and to utilize the retrieved documents effectively for text generation.
  4. Benefits: The advantage of RAG is that it allows the language model to access a broader range of information than what it was trained on. This means it can provide more accurate and informed responses, especially for questions that require up-to-date or specialized knowledge. Additionally, it can mitigate some of the hallucination issues of language models by grounding responses in retrieved documents.
  5. Applications: RAG can be particularly useful in question-answering systems, where the ability to pull in relevant information can significantly improve the quality of answers. It’s also used in chatbots and other conversational AI systems to provide responses that are more informative and contextually relevant.

RAG represents a hybrid approach, leveraging the ability of retrieval systems to provide accurate information and the creative and linguistic flexibility of generative models to produce human-like text. This approach can offer the best of both worlds, improving the performance of AI systems in tasks that require both a broad knowledge base and the ability to generate coherent and contextually appropriate language.

The different fine-tuning methods for LLMs:

Supervised Fine-Tuning

The most common approach involves training the LLM on a labeled dataset where the correct outputs are known. For example, fine-tuning GPT-3 for sentiment analysis might involve training it on a dataset of product reviews labeled with sentiments.

Example: Using Hugging Face’s transformers library, you can fine-tune a pre-trained model by creating a labeled dataset and then training the model with a task-specific head on top.

Transfer Learning

Transfer learning takes a model trained on one task and fine-tunes it on a related task. This is particularly useful when the new task has limited data.

Example: BERT, initially trained on a general corpus, can be fine-tuned for legal document analysis by further training on legal texts.

Here is a hands-on example for Transfer learning for GPT-J6B

Prompt Tuning

This involves crafting prompts that guide the LLM to generate desired responses. The prompts can be fixed phrases or learned embeddings.

Example: GPT-3 can be “prompt tuned” by crafting a series of instructions that lead it to generate text in a certain style or format, without updating the model weights.

Few-Shot Learning

LLMs like GPT-3 can generalize from a few examples, making them ideal for few-shot learning where the model is given a small number of examples of the desired task.

Example: Presenting GPT-3 with a few examples of Q&A pairs to enable it to answer questions in a similar format.

Zero-Shot Learning

LLMs can sometimes perform tasks they weren’t explicitly trained for, using zero-shot learning based on their pre-training alone.

Example: Asking GPT-3 to translate text or summarize a document without prior examples or training on translation or summarization tasks.

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA)

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) aims to improve model performance in a target domain using unlabeled data. Pre-trained language models (PrLMs) have shown promising results in UDA, leveraging their generic knowledge from diverse domains. However, fine-tuning all parameters of a PrLM on a small domain-specific corpus can distort this knowledge and be costly for deployment. The following article explains an adapter-based fine-tuning approach to address these challenges.

Here is a hands-on example of Domain-Adaptive Fine-Tuning:

The following articles provide more details and hands-on examples:

Example: Before fine-tuning a model for medical diagnoses, it might undergo UDA on medical research papers.

Task-Adaptive Pre-Training (TAPT)

Similar to UDA, TAPT involves additional pre-training on data related to the specific task at hand.

Example: An LLM could be TAPT on customer service dialogues before fine-tuning for a customer support chatbot.

Adversarial Training

This technique trains the model to be robust against inputs designed to deceive or confuse it.

Example: Training an LLM to recognize and resist adversarial attacks by exposing it to misleading prompts during the fine-tuning process.

Multitask Learning

Fine-tuning an LLM on multiple tasks can help it learn more general features that are useful across different applications.

Example: Fine-tuning a model on both sentiment analysis and text classification to improve its overall understanding of the text.

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)

RLHF stands for “Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback.” It is a method of training machine learning models, particularly in the field of artificial intelligence and robotics, where a model is trained to perform tasks by receiving feedback from human interactions or evaluations.

The basic idea is to use reinforcement learning (RL), a type of machine learning where an agent learns to make decisions by performing actions in an environment to maximize some notion of cumulative reward. In the context of RLHF, the “reward” is often derived from human feedback, which can come in various forms:

  1. Human Ratings: People rate the quality of the model’s outputs or decisions, and these ratings are used as rewards.
  2. Preference Comparisons: Humans are presented with pairs of outputs or actions and indicate which one they prefer.
  3. Demonstrations: Humans demonstrate the desired behavior by providing examples, which the model then tries to imitate.
  4. Corrective Feedback: Humans provide corrections to the model’s actions or outputs, guiding it toward better performance.

RLHF is particularly relevant in scenarios where it is difficult to define a clear reward function that the model can use to learn. For instance, in natural language processing tasks like dialogue generation or translation, it can be challenging to quantify what makes a response “good” or “correct.” Human feedback provides a more nuanced and contextually aware signal for the model to learn from.

This approach has been used to train more sophisticated and safer AI systems that align better with human values and preferences, such as OpenAI’s GPT-3 and other advanced language models. It’s a crucial area of research for AI safety and alignment.

Instruction Fine-Tuning

Instruction fine-tuning is a method used to improve a language model’s ability to follow and understand instructions within prompts. It is particularly relevant for language models that are expected to perform specific tasks based on user prompts, such as answering questions, summarizing information, translating languages, and more.

In instruction fine-tuning, the model is trained on a dataset where the inputs are instructions and the desired outputs are the model’s actions or responses that comply with those instructions. This process helps the model learn to decipher the intent behind various phrasings of instructions and to generate the correct output for a wide range of command-like inputs.

This method falls under the umbrella of Supervised Fine-Tuning, as it typically requires a labeled dataset with clear instruction-response pairs. During the fine-tuning process, the model’s parameters are adjusted to minimize the difference between its outputs and the provided responses, thereby teaching the model to follow instructions more accurately.

Instruction fine-tuning can also be considered a specialized form of Prompt Tuning, where the model is not only fine-tuned to process information in a certain way but specifically to follow the structure and intent of instructional prompts. It’s an increasingly important area of research as conversational AI and interactive systems become more prevalent, demanding models to understand and execute a wide variety of tasks as instructed by users.

Combining Prompt Templates and LoRA for Flexible Language Model Specialization

A popular approach is using prompt templates during fine-tuning, combined with an efficient technique called LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation). This allows building domain experts while maintaining the general competencies of the base model.

The Fine-Tuning Process

  1. Starting with a Pre-trained Model: Begin with a GPT/Llama model pre-trained on a diverse dataset.
  2. Selecting the Fine-Tuning Dataset: Choose a dataset that closely aligns with the desired specialization.
  3. Further Training: The model is trained (fine-tuned) on this new dataset. This process usually requires a lower learning rate than the initial training.

Python Example: Fine-Tuning GPT for Legal Language

Let’s walk through an example of fine-tuning a GPT model to better understand legal language using Python.

Prerequisites:

  • A pre-trained GPT model (like GPT-3)
  • A dataset of legal documents
  • Python environment with necessary libraries (like transformers and torch)

Step 1: Import Libraries

from transformers import GPT2LMHeadModel, GPT2Tokenizer, TextDataset, DataCollatorForLanguageModeling
from transformers import Trainer, TrainingArguments
import torch

Step 2: Load Pre-trained Model

tokenizer = GPT2Tokenizer.from_pretrained('gpt2')
model = GPT2LMHeadModel.from_pretrained('gpt2')

Step 3: Prepare Dataset

train_path = 'path/to/legal_dataset.txt'
train_dataset = TextDataset(
tokenizer=tokenizer,
file_path=train_path,
block_size=128)

data_collator = DataCollatorForLanguageModeling(
tokenizer=tokenizer, mlm=False)

Step 4: Fine-Tuning

training_args = TrainingArguments(
output_dir="./gpt2-legal",
overwrite_output_dir=True,
num_train_epochs=3,
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
save_steps=10_000,
save_total_limit=2,
)

trainer = Trainer(
model=model,
args=training_args,
data_collator=data_collator,
train_dataset=train_dataset,
)

trainer.train()

Step 5: Testing the Fine-Tuned Model After fine-tuning, test the model’s performance on legal language.

LLM Fine-Tuning Hyperparameters

In the burgeoning field of artificial intelligence, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 stand as titans, driving innovation and understanding across diverse applications. From generating human-like text to providing insights into complex datasets, the capabilities of LLMs are reshaping the landscape of technology and communication. However, the efficacy of these powerful models hinges on a crucial, often understated aspect of machine learning: fine-tuning hyperparameters. This process is akin to adjusting the instruments of an orchestra to achieve perfect harmony — a meticulous balancing act that can mean the difference between cacophony and symphony.

In this article, we’ll explore the intricacies of three primary hyperparameters that guide the fine-tuning process of LLMs: epochs, learning rate, and batch size. Each of these parameters plays a pivotal role in the learning process of the model, affecting everything from the speed and efficiency of training to the accuracy and reliability of the outcomes.

=====================

Hands-On Examples for Fine-Tuning Using Different Approaches:

Example 1: GPT-J 6B Domain Adaptation Fine-Tuning

Fine-tuning pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-J 6B through domain adaptation is a powerful technique in machine learning, particularly in natural language processing. This method, also known as transfer learning, involves retraining a pre-existing model on a dataset specific to a certain domain, enhancing the model’s performance in that area.

GPT-J 6B is a large open-source language model (LLM) that produces human-like text. The “6B” in the name refers to the model’s 6 billion parameters.

GPT-J 6B was developed by EleutherAI in 2021. It’s an open-source alternative to OpenAI’s GPT-3. GPT-J 6B is trained on the Pile dataset and uses Ben Wang’s Mesh Transformer JAX.

The following article has a hands-on example of domain adaptation fine-tuning using SageMaker Jumpstart

Example 2: Llama2 on AWS SageMaker

Diving into the world of machine learning doesn’t always require an intricate and complex start. The following quick-start guide is tailored for those looking to rapidly deploy and execute Llama2 commands on AWS SageMaker. Whether you’re looking to integrate advanced AI capabilities into your applications or simply exploring the possibilities of language models, this article will walk you through the essential steps to get Llama2 up and running on SageMaker. In just a few simple steps, you’ll gain the know-how to leverage the power of one of the most sophisticated language models in a robust cloud computing environment, allowing you to begin your AI journey without the need for a deep technical dive.

Example 3: Fine-Tune Llama2 with Hugging Face Autotrain on SageMaker

Embarking on the journey of fine-tuning machine learning models can be a daunting task, but with the advent of tools like Hugging Face’s AutoTrain and the power of AWS SageMaker, it becomes an accessible venture for many. The following article aims to demystify the process, offering a streamlined guide to fine-tuning the formidable Llama2 Large Language Model (LLM) using Hugging Face’s intuitive AutoTrain command within the versatile AWS SageMaker environment. Whether you’re looking to tailor Llama2 for a niche linguistic task or optimize it for your specific dataset, this guide will walk you through the necessary steps, settings, and considerations to effectively enhance your model’s performance, making the most of the cloud’s computational prowess and the user-friendly interface of AutoTrain.

Example 5: Fine-Tune LLama2 using LAMINI on Google Colab

Among the most promising developments in this realm is the integration of LLama2 with Lamini, a state-of-the-art platform designed for enterprises and developers. Lamini stands out in the crowded field of LLM platforms by offering an unparalleled blend of ease, speed, and performance, enabling the creation of customized private models that surpass the capabilities of general LLMs. The following article aims to delve into the process of fine-tuning LLama2 using Lamini, highlighting how this synergy can revolutionize the way we approach and implement language models in various industry sectors. By harnessing the advanced features of Lamini, we will explore the transformation of the already potent LLama2 model into a tool even more tailored and effective for specific enterprise needs.

Example 6: Fine-Tuning LLaMA2 with Alpaca Dataset Using Alpaca-LoRA

Example 7: Fine-Tuning Llama2 On Predibase Using LoRAX

LoRAX Land is a collection of 25 fine-tuned Mistral-7b models, which are task-specialized large language models (LLMs) developed by Predibase. These models are fine-tuned using Predibase’s platform and consistently outperform base models by 70% and GPT-4 by 4–15%, depending on the task. Predibase offers state-of-the-art fine-tuning techniques, such as quantization and low-rank adaptation, and employs a novel architecture called LoRA Exchange (LoRAX) to dynamically serve many fine-tuned LLMs together for significant cost reduction. In this article, I will show how easy and inexpensive to fine-tune a model on Predibase.

Example 8: Fine Tune mistral-7b-instruct on Predibase with your Own Data and LoRax

Ethical Considerations and Bias

Fine-tuning must be approached with an awareness of potential biases in the training data. It’s crucial to ensure that the model does not propagate stereotypes or biased viewpoints.

Resources and Accessibility

Fine-tuning a large model like GPT or Llama2 can be resource-intensive. However, platforms provided by organizations like OpenAI have made it more accessible.

Conclusion

Fine-tuning LLM models such as GPT and LLama models is a powerful way to enhance their specialization in various domains. By training on a specific dataset, these models can be tailored for tasks ranging from customer service automation to complex legal analyses. The Python example provided offers a glimpse into how fine-tuning can be practically implemented, marking a significant stride in the customization of AI language models.

--

--

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ranyelhousieny Software/AI/ML/Data engineering manager with extensive experience in technical management, AI/ML, AI Solutions Archit